Plan

Homelessness: Homelessness in our own Backyard!

[+] Read more

Plan
Fighting Stereotypes through Community action and film

Homelessness especially in the downtown eastside of Vancouver is a complex issue that obviously cannot be solve in a paragraph. Yet as shown byinitiatives by community players like Pivot Legal Society', the solution must come from within, rather than without. First public perception of the DTES must be changed, and secondly local community members should be empowered to take charge of their own communities.

The vast majority of people that reside and live outside the DTES have extremely inaccurately negative perceptions of the DTES. Already the residents and homeless of the DTES have become akin to the untouchables of India to many lower mainland residents. In order to combat homelessness it is imperative that we fight these stereotypes of what it means to be homeless. As long as people can continue to view homeless peoples as a seperate group of people, it becomes easier to forget they are also complex human beings with their own wants, needs, goals, etc. To view the homeless as the "other" allows people to continue to walk past the homeless on the street without batting an eye, to trust to a failing government welfare system to "take care" of them, to ignore gentrification continuing to push our fellow people further into what Agamden calls "bare life". A great example of how we can fight these stereotypes of homelessness and the DTES is Pivot's Hope in Shadows campaign. Publishing both a book and a calendar, the project highlights several DTES residents but focuses on not their residential status, but on their humanity and relationships: the very things that they share with everyone else.

Secondly, it is imperative that solutions be grassroots situated. The peculiarities of any community is much to complex for any outside observer to understand. While those in the community undoubtedly have great ideas concerning what progress needs to be made in the community what they are lacking are technical expertise and resources. Thus this is where marriage can happen between concerned outsiders (for a lack of a better term) and residents.

What sort of solution can we come up with to suit both the points mentioned above? 

I propose that a series of community brainstorm sessions be held between residents of the DTES and other concerned peoples. Through these sessions, ideas should be discussed about essential services that are needed in the community, and a roadmap created to acheive one or some of these services. As these ideas develop and mature, a core group of both residents and outsiders will put the plan into action, starting up a new community initiative with the backing of the community.

The kicker is this: the entire process and experience should be recorded by a documentary crew, highlighting not just the initiative, but more importantly the relationships that are created; highlighting how both residents of the DTES and outsiders are the same rather than different., highlighting the humanity of homelessness and not why the homeless should be pitied.

gucci bags      (Thursday, 12 August 2010 @ 00:17)

As we all known GHD is a famous brand both in home and abroad.The GHD IV Salon Styler comes complete with a DVD demonstration of the GHD styler functions and teaches you how to straighten ,curl and style your hair the way your hairdresser does. The GHD hair straighteners also have impressive appearance .If you want to be beautiful,GHD will absolutely be your choice.

http://ghdhaiir.com

DamonC      (Wednesday, 24 June 2009 @ 18:14)

@ Lisa_papania The tone of media is set by its producers. The reality shows we have grown accustomed to seeing on mainstream media are set to be visceral repugnant pieces that cater to sensationalism and shallow values to appeal to the lowest common denominator. But the documentary that this project would aim to produce would not share those same production values in the least. How a cinematic adaptation of this will be achieved that embodies the values and virtues we are trying to extol will be up to the documentary team. But I am certain that there is enough of a talent pool out there in the SFU community and beyond that this will not be an issue.

lisa_papania      (Wednesday, 24 June 2009 @ 10:20)

Damon C, it''s not my understanding from what you''ve written that the homeless should be pitied; but in fact the opposite...pretty much exactly along the lines of what Skwok''s actually suggesting (i.e. I think you''re saying pretty much the same thing). I think your idea is an interesting one, but perhaps I watch too much bad TV, but I''m getting a vision of drama being created through personalities not getting along, or highlighting people''s weaknesses, which I have no doubt you don''t intend at all. So how would the documentary process highlight the positives of the initiative, rather than magnifying the negatives?

DamonC      (Tuesday, 23 June 2009 @ 20:40)

whooooa... that is totally not what I meant... edit! EDIT!

Scott      (Tuesday, 23 June 2009 @ 14:54)

Skwok you should really reread that last sentence. "highlighting the humanity of homelessness ...*not* why the homeless should be pitied." This idea is to precisely counteract the negative sterotypes of DTES residents being dirty, unintelligible, animalistic and beyond hope. This documentary would show that they are indeed, very similar to your average BC citizen.

Skwok      (Tuesday, 23 June 2009 @ 13:51)

Okay I was completely with you up in until the last word =D I don''t really think having people pity the homeless should be a goal. However I think having interaction and dialogue with people in the DTES is really important. It is akin to the idea of mixed-income social housing. It is important not to segregate people into classes but mix them together so that they can learn from each other and gain understanding. I like the idea of the documentary as well as it like any good documentary, it allows people to gain in depth insight into a place they normally wouldn''t be.